Parliamentary Debate on SEND Reform – Key Implications for Schools

Overview

On 13 April 2026, MPs held a Backbench Business Committee debate on the state of Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision in England, called for by MP Gregory Stafford.

MP Gregory Stafford opened up the debate with an introduction setting out that in his opinion “any credible reform of SEND, including the Government’s White Paper, must meet three tests. It must strengthen legal protections, improve delivery on the ground and address the underlying pressures in the system. If it does all three, it can and will save money in the long run, but I am afraid that the Government’s proposals fall short on all three”.

The debate continued reflecting strong cross-party concern regarding delays to reform and increasing pressure on the system, as well as concern about the future raised by constituents, putting at the forefront of our minds that behind the discussions are human stories (Dr Al Pinkerton, (Surrey Heath MP). A reality many educational institutions have been dealing with for some time.

Government Position

During the debate the Government acknowledged systemic pressures and confirmed that reform remains a priority. However:

• No firm timetable for the reform was provided
• Emphasis was placed on balancing improved outcomes with financial sustainability

Practical Implications for Schools

In the interim while we await movement on the reforms, education institutions should expect a continued pressure on school-based SEND provision; delays in EHCP processing, increased parental challenge and complaints, as well as greater reliance on school-led interventions and should seek support when required.

Looking Ahead

The debate signals that SEND reform is likely to remain a central policy issue throughout 2026. Schools should prepare for potential structural changes once Government proposals are published.